(fra kommisjonsforordningen)

(1)    Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting such an authorisation. Article 10(2) of that Regulation provides for the re-evaluation of additives authorised pursuant to Council Directive 70/524/EEC .

(2)    The substance rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn., previously identified as Rosmarinus officinalis L., was authorised without a time limit in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC as a feed additive for all animal species. This substance was subsequently entered in the Register of Feed Additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10(1), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

(3)    In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 thereof, an application was submitted for the authorisation of rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. as a feed additive for all animal species, requesting the additive to be classified in the additive category ‘sensory additives’ and in the functional group ‘flavouring compounds’. The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. 

(4)    The applicant requested the additive to be authorised also for use in water for drinking. However, Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 does not allow the authorisation of ‘flavouring compounds’ for use in water for drinking. Therefore, the use of this additive in water for drinking should not be allowed.

(5)    The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 16 September 2025  that rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. is considered of no safety concern for target short-living animals and very unlikely to induce adverse effects for target long-living and reproductive animals and any other animal species at certain maximum concentrations further specified in that opinion for each species. Furthermore, it concluded that no safety concern would be expected for consumers of animal products from the use of rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn., under the proposed conditions of use, and that its use, under the proposed conditions of use, is not expected to pose a risk to the environment. The Authority concluded that rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes and as skin and respiratory sensitiser. It also stated that unprotected users may be exposed to methyleugenol and estragole when handling rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn.. The Authority further concluded that since rosemary and its preparations are recognised to flavour food and their function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy is considered necessary. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. 

(6)    In view of the above, the Commission considers that rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. satisfies the conditions provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Accordingly, the use of that substance should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation. The Commission considers that the presence of estragole and methyleugenol, substances of concern belonging to the group of p-allylalkoxybenzenes, in rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. requires the setting of maximum content for this feed additive in complete feed. It also considers that a simultaneous use of rosemary essential oil from Salvia Rosmarinus Spenn. with other feed additives is permitted provided that the combined content of p-allylalkoxybenzenes (methyleugenol, estragole, elemicin, safrole, myristicin, dillapiole, and apiole) in feed materials and compound feed remains below the content that would result from using the authorised feed additive with the highest content of those substances at its maximum or recommended maximum content for the relevant animal species or category. In addition, the Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on the health of the users of the additive.

(7)    Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the modifications to the conditions of authorisation of the substance concerned, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period for interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the authorisation.

(8)    The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,