Forordning om digitale tjenester (Digital Services Act): gjennomføringsbestemmelser om administrative prosedyrer
Kommisjonens gjennomføringsforordning (EU) 2023/1201 av 21. juni 2023 om spesifikke ordninger for Kommisjonens gjennomføring av visse prosedyrer i henhold til europaparlaments- og rådsforordning (EU) 2022/2065
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1201 of 21 June 2023 on detailed arrangements for the conduct of certain proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Kommisjonsforordning publisert i EU-tidende 22.6.2023
Nærmere omtale
BAKGRUNN (fra kommisjonsforordningen)
(1) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 empowers the Commission to adopt implementing acts concerning the practical arrangements in respect of certain aspects of proceedings under that Regulation. In compliance with the principle of good administration and the principle of legal certainty, it is necessary to lay down rules concerning the powers of the Commission to conduct inspections pursuant to Article 69 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 and to take the necessary monitoring actions pursuant to Article 72 of that Regulation. It is also necessary to lay down rules concerning the exercise of the right to be heard by the addressees of the Commission’s preliminary findings and access to the Commission’s file provided by Article 79 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
(2) Article 69(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 empowers Commission officials and other accompanying persons authorised by the Commission to conduct an inspection to ask any representative or member of staff of the provider of very large online platform or of very large online search engine concerned or, where applicable, of the other persons concerned referred to in Article 67(1) of that Regulation for explanations on facts or documents relating to the subject-matter and purpose of the inspection and to record the answers. Pursuant to Article 74(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 fines may be imposed on such providers or such persons where they fail to rectify within the time period set by the Commission an incorrect, incomplete or misleading answer given by a representative or member of their staff to questions in the course of an inspection. It is therefore necessary to provide such providers and such persons with a record of any explanations given and to establish a procedure enabling them to rectify, amend or supplement explanations given, including by a representative or member of staff who has given such explanations but was not authorised to do so. Explanations given by a representative or a member of staff should remain in the Commission’s file as recorded during the inspection.
(3) Pursuant to Article 72 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, the Commission may take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation of and compliance with that Regulation. To this end, the Commission should be able to order providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines to provide access to and explanations of their databases and algorithms, where this is necessary to ensure effective compliance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Access to such databases may consist of enabling the Commission to search such databases through the use of queries, as needed to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. In this context, the Commission should also be able to require such providers to retain necessary documents, under the terms determined by the Commission. To ensure that the Commission possesses the necessary knowledge and expertise in carrying out its tasks under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, the Commission should be able to appoint external experts and auditors to assist it in the exercise of its supervisory tasks. Such experts and auditors should be independent from the provider concerned and possess the necessary expertise and knowledge to assist the Commission. To this end, it is necessary to lay down requirements on the independence and expertise of such experts and auditors.
(4) Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 requires the Commission, before adopting a decision pursuant to Articles 73(1), 74 or 76 of that Regulation, to give a provider of very large online platform or of very large online search engine or another person referred to in Article 67(1) of Regulation 2022/2065 to whom it has notified preliminary findings the opportunity of being heard on those findings and on measures that the Commission may intend to take in view of those findings. Such providers and such persons should present their views in writing, within a time period set by the Commission, with a view to reconciling the efficiency and effectiveness of the proceedings, on one hand, and the possibility to exercise the right to be heard, on the other. The addressee of the preliminary findings should have the right to set out succinctly the relevant facts and provide supporting evidence. In order to ensure fair and efficient proceedings, the effective and full enforcement of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and legal certainty for all persons concerned, it is necessary to set out rules as regards the format and maximum length of written observations and the use of languages.
(5) Article 79(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 requires the Commission to grant access to its file to the parties concerned by its proceedings. While the addressee of the preliminary findings should always obtain from the Commission the non-confidential versions of all documents mentioned in the preliminary findings, the Commission should be able to decide on a case-by-case basis on the appropriate procedure for access to further information in the file. When granting access to the file, the Commission should ensure the protection of business secrets and other confidential information. The Commission should be able to request persons that submit or have submitted information or documents in the course of proceedings to identify business secrets or other confidential information. The Commission should, before making this information available to the addressee of its preliminary findings, assess for each individual document whether, with view to an effective exercise of the right to be heard, the need to disclose is greater than the harm to the person that submitted the information or documents which might result from disclosure.
(1) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 empowers the Commission to adopt implementing acts concerning the practical arrangements in respect of certain aspects of proceedings under that Regulation. In compliance with the principle of good administration and the principle of legal certainty, it is necessary to lay down rules concerning the powers of the Commission to conduct inspections pursuant to Article 69 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 and to take the necessary monitoring actions pursuant to Article 72 of that Regulation. It is also necessary to lay down rules concerning the exercise of the right to be heard by the addressees of the Commission’s preliminary findings and access to the Commission’s file provided by Article 79 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
(2) Article 69(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 empowers Commission officials and other accompanying persons authorised by the Commission to conduct an inspection to ask any representative or member of staff of the provider of very large online platform or of very large online search engine concerned or, where applicable, of the other persons concerned referred to in Article 67(1) of that Regulation for explanations on facts or documents relating to the subject-matter and purpose of the inspection and to record the answers. Pursuant to Article 74(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 fines may be imposed on such providers or such persons where they fail to rectify within the time period set by the Commission an incorrect, incomplete or misleading answer given by a representative or member of their staff to questions in the course of an inspection. It is therefore necessary to provide such providers and such persons with a record of any explanations given and to establish a procedure enabling them to rectify, amend or supplement explanations given, including by a representative or member of staff who has given such explanations but was not authorised to do so. Explanations given by a representative or a member of staff should remain in the Commission’s file as recorded during the inspection.
(3) Pursuant to Article 72 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, the Commission may take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation of and compliance with that Regulation. To this end, the Commission should be able to order providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines to provide access to and explanations of their databases and algorithms, where this is necessary to ensure effective compliance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Access to such databases may consist of enabling the Commission to search such databases through the use of queries, as needed to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. In this context, the Commission should also be able to require such providers to retain necessary documents, under the terms determined by the Commission. To ensure that the Commission possesses the necessary knowledge and expertise in carrying out its tasks under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, the Commission should be able to appoint external experts and auditors to assist it in the exercise of its supervisory tasks. Such experts and auditors should be independent from the provider concerned and possess the necessary expertise and knowledge to assist the Commission. To this end, it is necessary to lay down requirements on the independence and expertise of such experts and auditors.
(4) Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 requires the Commission, before adopting a decision pursuant to Articles 73(1), 74 or 76 of that Regulation, to give a provider of very large online platform or of very large online search engine or another person referred to in Article 67(1) of Regulation 2022/2065 to whom it has notified preliminary findings the opportunity of being heard on those findings and on measures that the Commission may intend to take in view of those findings. Such providers and such persons should present their views in writing, within a time period set by the Commission, with a view to reconciling the efficiency and effectiveness of the proceedings, on one hand, and the possibility to exercise the right to be heard, on the other. The addressee of the preliminary findings should have the right to set out succinctly the relevant facts and provide supporting evidence. In order to ensure fair and efficient proceedings, the effective and full enforcement of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and legal certainty for all persons concerned, it is necessary to set out rules as regards the format and maximum length of written observations and the use of languages.
(5) Article 79(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 requires the Commission to grant access to its file to the parties concerned by its proceedings. While the addressee of the preliminary findings should always obtain from the Commission the non-confidential versions of all documents mentioned in the preliminary findings, the Commission should be able to decide on a case-by-case basis on the appropriate procedure for access to further information in the file. When granting access to the file, the Commission should ensure the protection of business secrets and other confidential information. The Commission should be able to request persons that submit or have submitted information or documents in the course of proceedings to identify business secrets or other confidential information. The Commission should, before making this information available to the addressee of its preliminary findings, assess for each individual document whether, with view to an effective exercise of the right to be heard, the need to disclose is greater than the harm to the person that submitted the information or documents which might result from disclosure.