(Utkast) Delegert kommisjonsforordning (EU) .../... av 30. september 2024 om utfylling av europaparlaments- og rådsforordning (EU) 2023/1114 med hensyn til tekniske reguleringsstandarder for krav, maler og prosedyrer ved håndtering av klager knyttet til aktiva-baserte tokens
Europeisk rammeverk for markeder for kryptoverdier (MiCA): utfyllende bestemmelser om klagehåndtering knyttet til aktiva-baserte tokens
Utkast til delegert kommisjonsforordning sendt til Europaparlamentet og Rådet for klarering 30.9.2024
Bakgrunn
BAKGRUNN (fra kommisjonsforordningen)
(1) In the interest of consumer protection, and in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, and, where applicable, the thirdparty entities as referred to in Article 34(5), first subparagraph, point (h), of that Regulation, should provide holders of asset-referenced tokens and other interested parties with information on the complaints handling procedures. Furthermore, those issuers and third-party entities should make available to them a harmonised template in the languages that those issuers and third-party entities use to market their services or in the languages that they use to communicate with the holder of asset-referenced tokens.
(2) In order to ensure transparency for complainants and enable them to effectively access and use complaint procedures, such information should include that their complaints are filed and handled free of charge, in the languages used by the issuers of assetreferenced tokens and, where applicable, the third-party entities, to market their services, or in the languages they use to communicate with the holder of assetreferenced tokens, and in the official languages of the home Member State and host Member States, that are also official languages of the Union.
(3) In order to avoid diverging complaints-handling procedures among issuers of assetreferenced tokens and third-party entities, complainants should be able to file their complaints using a harmonised template in the complaints-handling procedures with those issuers, and, where applicable, the third-party entities, irrespective of where those issuers or third-party entities are established or where the token was distributed within the Union. However, even if the complainant files the complaint in a format other than the template, the issuer, and the third party entity, should still handle the complaint and not reject it for that reason.
(4) To ensure effective and transparent procedures for the prompt, fair and consistent handling of complaints by holders of asset-referenced tokens and other interested parties, the issuer of asset-referenced tokens, and where applicable, third-party entities, should acknowledge receipt of a complaint clearly mentioning the date of its receipt and, where an electronic complaint form is filed, provide the complainant with a copy of the complaint. Furthermore, the issuer of asset-referenced tokens should assess whether the complaint is admissible and contains all relevant information necessary for the complaints investigation and promptly request from the holders of assetreferenced tokens and other interested parties any additional information needed for the prompt and effective investigation and handling of the complaint.
(5) In order to ensure equal treatment in the Union, it should be specified what would constitute a ‘reasonable period’ for an issuer of asset-referenced tokens to communicate the outcome of its investigations. The issuer should keep the complainant informed about the progress of the complaints-handling procedure and provide a response without undue delay and in any event within the time limits set at national level to address complaints filed by complainants, where applicable. The issuer should assess all complaints, identifying shortcomings that may be recurring.
(6) In accordance with the data minimisation principle, only personal data that is necessary for handling the complaint, should be requested.
(7) This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards, developed in close cooperation with the European Securities and Markets Authority, submitted to the Commission by the European Banking Authority.
(8) The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the advice of the European Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(9) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council and delivered an opinion on 21 June 2024,